Lesión acral como primera manifestación de un adenocarcinoma de colon metastásico / Acral injury as first manifestation of a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon

No disponible

Fully covered self-expanding metal stents in the management of difficult common bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: plastic biliary stents are often used after an ERCP session without complete common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction. Sometimes, the volume of biliary drainage with these stents may be insufficient. We present our experience with the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) in the setting of incomplete CBDS extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: after an ERCP session with difficult CBDS not completely removed, biliary FCSEMS (Wallflex) were inserted in some patients when it was deemed that biliary sphincterotomy and a single plastic stent would not provide an adequate drainage. RESULTS: a retrospective study was performed. Biliary FCSEMS were inserted in 29 patients, mean age 81 years. CBDS could not be extracted through a biliary sphincterotomy due to its large size (n = 18) or because of the presence of inflammatory distal strictures (n = 11). The greatest biliary drainage with shortest ERCP time was considered mandatory due to clinical instability of patients and/or poor tolerance to conscious sedation administered by the endoscopist. Successful biliary drainage was obtained in all cases. FCSEMS were removed after a median of 199.5 days in 16 patients with a complete CBDS extraction in 15 (93.7%). FCSEMS were not removed in the remaining 13 patients due to their clinical condition, and a wait-and-see strategy was undertaken. CONCLUSIONS: in selected cases, utilization of removable FCSEMS can be a good option for a quick and adequate biliary drainage in the setting of difficult CBDS. Because of the higher cost of these stents its use needs to be individualized.

Prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles totalmente recubiertas en el tratamiento de coledocolitiasis difíciles / Fully covered self-expanding metal stents in the management of difficult common bile duct stones

Introducción y objetivos: las prótesis biliares plásticas suelen emplearse tras una sesión de CPRE sin extracción completa de coledocolitiasis. En ocasiones, el calibre de drenaje con estas prótesis puede ser insuficiente. Presentamos nuestra experiencia en la utilización de prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles totalmente recubiertas (PMATR) en coledocolitiasis no extraídas. Pacientes y métodos: se insertó una PMATR (Wallflex biliar) en algunos pacientes con coledocolitiasis difíciles no extraídas tras una sesión de CPRE cuando se consideró que la esfinterotomía biliar y una prótesis plástica no aportaban un calibre de drenaje adecuado. Resultados: estudio retrospectivo en el que se utilizó una PMATR en 29 pacientes, edad media 81 años. Las coledocolitiasis no pudieron extraerse por la esfinterotomía biliar debido a su gran tamaño (n = 18) o por la presencia de estenosis distal inflamatoria (n = 11). Se consideró que era preciso el mayor drenaje biliar con el menor tiempo posible de CPRE debido a la situación de inestabilidad clínica de los pacientes y/o a la mala tolerancia a la sedación consciente administrada por el endoscopista. Se obtuvo un drenaje biliar adecuado en todos los casos. Las PMATR se retiraron tras una mediana de 199,5 días en 16 pacientes, obteniéndose una extracción completa de las coledocolitiasis en 15 (93,7%). No se extrajeron las PMATR en los 13 restantes debido a su situación clínica, manteniéndose una conducta expectante. Conclusiones: en casos seleccionados, la utilización de PMATR extraíbles es una buena opción para obtener un drenaje biliar adecuado y rápido en coledocolitiasis difíciles. El mayor coste de estas prótesis precisa que se individualice su utilización(AU)

Background and objectives: plastic biliary stents are often used after an ERCP session without complete common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction. Sometimes, the volume of biliary drainage with these stents may be insufficient. We present our experience with the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) in the setting of incomplete CBDS extraction. Patients and methods: after an ERCP session with difficult CBDS not completely removed, biliary FCSEMS (Wallflex) were inserted in some patients when it was deemed that biliary sphincterotomy and a single plastic stent would not provide an adequate drainage. Results: a retrospective study was performed. Biliary FCSEMS were inserted in 29 patients, mean age 81 years. CBDS could not be extracted through a biliary sphincterotomy due to its large size (n = 18) or because of the presence of inflammatory distal strictures (n = 11). The greatest biliary drainage with shortest ERCP time was considered mandatory due to clinical instability of patients and/or poor tolerance to conscious sedation administered by the endoscopist. Successful biliary drainage was obtained in all cases. FCSEMS were removed after a median of 199.5 days in 16 patients with a complete CBDS extraction in 15 (93.7%). FCSEMS were not removed in the remaining 13 patients due to their clinical condition, and a wait-and-see strategy was undertaken. Conclusions: in selected cases, utilization of removable FCSEMS can be a good option for a quick and adequate biliary drainage in the setting of difficult CBDS. Because of the higher cost of these stents its use needs to be individualized(AU)

Criterios estándar versus clasificación de Rosemont para el diagnóstico ecoendoscópico de pancreatitis crónica / Standard criteria versus Rosemont classification for EUS-diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis

Objetivo: analizar las posibles diferencias en el diagnóstico final de pancreatitis crónica empleando los criterios estándar descritos por Wiersema y cols. y la nueva clasificación propuesta recientemente en Rosemont. Material y métodos: se incluyen 47 pacientes con diagnóstico de pancreatitis crónica. Se estudian los criterios parenquimatosos y ductales, dividiendo a los pacientes en 2 grupos según los criterios de Wiersema: < 4 criterios, no diagnóstico de pancreatitis crónica, >= 4 criterios, diagnóstico de pancreatitis crónica. Se estudiaron nuevamente dichos pacientes aplicando la clasificación de Rosemont: páncreas normal, indeterminado, sugestivo y diagnóstico de pancreatitis crónica. Se analizaron estos datos con la prueba estadística Chi-cuadrado con un intervalo de confianza de 95%. Resultados: en los pacientes con pancreatitis crónica el criterio presente con mayor frecuencia es la lobularidad en 66% de los casos seguido de la dilatación del Wirsung y la presencia de calcificaciones en 57,4% respectivamente. Se observó una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre los resultados de ambas clasificaciones (p < 0,05). La mayor asociación se encontró para pacientes que presentaban más de 4 criterios estándar y diagnóstico definitivo de pancreatitis crónica según la clasificación de Rosemont. Sin embargo, los pacientes que presentaron menos de 4 criterios estándar fueron sugestivos de pancreatitis crónica mediante el empleo de la clasificación de Rosemont en un 27,66% de los casos (p < 0,05). Conclusión: estos resultados muestran que no existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas para los pacientes que presentan >= 4 criterios diagnósticos según los criterios estándar. No obstante, 27,66% pacientes con menos de 4 criterios estándar serían sugestivos de pancreatitis crónica según la clasificación de Rosemont (p < 0,05). Por tanto, esta nueva clasificación sería útil para pacientes con elevada sospecha de pancreatitis crónica que presenten < 4 criterios estándar pero con presencia de criterios de mayor importancia como las calcificaciones intraparenquimatosas, la lobularidad o las litiasis intraductales(AU)

Aim: to study the possible differences in the final diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis by using standard classification described by Wiersema et al. and the new classification proposed recently by Ro - semont. Material and methods: forty-seven patients with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis were included in this study. The parenchymal and ductal criteria were studied, the patients were divided in two groups for Wiersema criteria: < 4 criteria, non-diagnostic for chronic pancreatitis and >= 4 criteria, diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The same patients were divided in four groups according to Rosemont classification: normal pancreas, indeterminate, suggestive and consistent with chronic pancreatitis. We analyzed these data with Chisquare test reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: in patients with chronic pancreatitis the most frequent criteria observed were lobularity in 66% of cases and pancreatic duct dilatation and calcifications in 57.4% of cases each. We found a significant statistical association between the results of both classifications (p < 0.05). The highest association is found in patients with more than 4 standard criteria and definitive diagnostic of chronic pancreatitis according to Rosemont classification. In patients who have less than 4 standard criteria the diagnosis is suggestive of chronic pancreatitis by using the Rosemont classification in 27.66% (p < 0.05). Conclusion: these results show that no significant statistical differences are found for patients with > 4 criteria diagnosis by standard criteria. But 27.66% patients with less than 4 standard criteria would be suggestive according to Rosemont classification (p < 0.05). Hence, the new classification would be useful in patients with high suspicion of chronic pancreatitis with < 4 standard criteria but with more significance such as parenchymal lithiasis, lobularity or ductal calcifications(AU)

Standard criteria versus Rosemont classification for EUS-diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

AIM: to study the possible differences in the final diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis by using standard classification described by Wiersema et al. and the new classification proposed recently by Rosemont. MATERIAL AND METHODS: forty-seven patients with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis were included in this study. The parenchymal and ductal criteria were studied, the patients were divided in two groups for Wiersema criteria: < 4 criteria, non-diagnostic for chronic pancreatitis and ≥ 4 criteria, diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The same patients were divided in four groups according to Rosemont classification: normal pancreas, indeterminate, suggestive and consistent with chronic pancreatitis. We analyzed these data with Chisquare test reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: in patients with chronic pancreatitis the most frequent criteria observed were lobularity in 66% of cases and pancreatic duct dilatation and calcifications in 57.4% of cases each. We found a significant statistical association between the results of both classifications (p < 0.05). The highest association is found in patients with more than 4 standard criteria and definitive diagnostic of chronic pancreatitis according to Rosemont classification. In patients who have less than 4 standard criteria the diagnosis is suggestive of chronic pancreatitis by using the Rosemont classification in 27.66% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: these results show that no significant statistical differences are found for patients with > 4 criteria diagnosis by standard criteria. But 27.66% patients with less than 4 standard criteria would be suggestive according to Rosemont classification (p < 0.05). Hence, the new classification would be useful in patients with high suspicion of chronic pancreatitis with < 4 standard criteria but with more significance such as parenchymal lithiasis, lobularity or ductal calcifications.

Diagnostic yield and impact of capsule endoscopy on management of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.

This study assessed diagnostic yield and impact of capsule endoscopy on patient management. Seventy-five patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Clinical and followup information was collected by review of patient records and with personal contact with the referring physicians. All previous clinical information and interventions after capsule endoscopy and clinical outcome were noted. The indication was obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding in 36 patients (48%) and obscure-occult gastrointestinal bleeding in 39 patients (52%). Overall diagnostic yield was 66.7% considering relevant lesions. Followup was available in 31 patients. Capsule endoscopy changed clinical management in 61.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with another potential source of bleeding and patients whose onset was hematochezia were not good candidates for capsule endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy has a high diagnostic yield and a positive influence on clinical management in a high proportion of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Inserción endoscópica de prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles en obstrucciones tumorales del colon / Endoscopic insertion of self-expanding metal stents in malignant colonic obstructions

Antecedentes y objetivo: Las prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles se están utilizando, cada vez con más frecuencia, para resolver la obstrucción colónica tumoral. Después, los pacientes pueden intervenirse de forma electiva o bien, en casos no aptos para la cirugía, la prótesis sirve como tratamiento paliativo definitivo. Presentamos la experiencia de esta técnica en un hospital de nivel II del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de un período de 42 meses (desde mayo de 2002 hasta octubre de 2005), durante el cual se trató de resolver la obstrucción colónica en 43 ocasiones a 40 pacientes, mediante la inserción endoscópica de prótesis. Resultados: La inserción fue técnicamente posible en 41 intentos (95%) y se obtuvo un buen resultado clínico en 37 ocasiones (86%). Se utilizó sólo endoscopia 23 veces (53,5%), y en las otras 20 (46,5%) también fluoroscopia. De los 38 pacientes en que se obtuvo un buen resultado con la inserción, 34 lograron un éxito clínico total. Se intervino de forma electiva a 24 (63%) pacientes y la prótesis se consideró un tratamiento paliativo definitivo en 14 (37%). Hubo que intervenir finalmente a uno de estos pacientes por una fístula colovesical. Además de esta complicación, hubo otras 8: 3 prótesis migraron, una se obstruyó, 2 pacientes tuvieron tenesmo, otro presentó una bacteriemia tras la inserción, y se descubrió una perforación silente por la prótesis en una cirugía electiva. No hubo mortalidad derivada de las complica ciones. Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la inserción endoscópica de prótesis parece un método seguro y eficaz en el tratamiento inicial de la obstrucción colónica tumoral

Background and objective: Self-expanding metal stents are being increasingly used to resolve malignant colonic obstruction. Subsequently, patients can either undergo elective surgery, or the stent can serve as a definitive palliative treatment in patients unfit for surgery. We present our experience with this technique in our hospital, a level II center within the Spanish National Health Service, which can be considered a community hospital. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was performed of a 42-month period (May 2002 to October 2005), during which malignant colonic obstruction was treated by means of endoscopically inserted stents on 43 occasions in 40 patients. Results: Stent insertion was successfully performed in 41 attempts (95%) and good clinical results were obtained on 37 occasions (86%). Endoscopic means alone were used on 23 occasions (53.5%) and in the remaining 20 (46.5%), both endoscopy and fluoroscopy were employed. Of 38 patients with successfully inserted stents, clinical success was achieved, as a whole, in 34. Twenty-four of these patients (63%) subsequently underwent elective surgery while the stent served as a definitive palliative treatment in the remaining 14 (37%). One of these patients had to undergo further surgery due to a fistula between the colon and the bladder. There were eight other complications: three stent migrations and one stent obstruction occurred, two patients had tenesmus, one patient developed bacteremia after stent insertion, and a silent bowel perforation by the stent was found in an elective surgical procedure. There was no mortality. Conclusions: In our experience, endoscopically inserted stents seem to be a safe and effective method for the initial treatment of malignant colonic obstruction

[Endoscopic insertion of self-expanding metal stents in malignant colonic obstructions]. / Inserción endoscópica de prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles en obstrucciones tumorales del colon.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Self-expanding metal stents are being increasingly used to resolve malignant colonic obstruction. Subsequently, patients can either undergo elective surgery, or the stent can serve as a definitive palliative treatment in patients unfit for surgery. We present our experience with this technique in our hospital, a level II center within the Spanish National Health Service, which can be considered a community hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of a 42-month period (May 2002 to October 2005), during which malignant colonic obstruction was treated by means of endoscopically inserted stents on 43 occasions in 40 patients. RESULTS: Stent insertion was successfully performed in 41 attempts (95%) and good clinical results were obtained on 37 occasions (86%). Endoscopic means alone were used on 23 occasions (53.5%) and in the remaining 20 (46.5%), both endoscopy and fluoroscopy were employed. Of 38 patients with successfully inserted stents, clinical success was achieved, as a whole, in 34. Twenty-four of these patients (63%) subsequently underwent elective surgery while the stent served as a definitive palliative treatment in the remaining 14 (37%). One of these patients had to undergo further surgery due to a fistula between the colon and the bladder. There were eight other complications: three stent migrations and one stent obstruction occurred, two patients had tenesmus, one patient developed bacteremia after stent insertion, and a silent bowel perforation by the stent was found in an elective surgical procedure. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, endoscopically inserted stents seem to be a safe and effective method for the initial treatment of malignant colonic obstruction.